1. akuro-chan reblogged this from sherlockbbc
  2. ilovelovelylove reblogged this from sherlockbbc
  3. jenarwen reblogged this from thefallofgallifrey
  4. m00industries reblogged this from sherlockbbc
  5. enlea reblogged this from viviano
  6. interludesanddaydreams answered: It might just be a little random reference, at least I can’t see how the original story be fit into this part…
  7. supernalchiku reblogged this from sarufish
  8. freetobeyouandme reblogged this from supernalchiku
  9. lemmierules reblogged this from paintedapples11
  10. mellarkspatronus reblogged this from conversepotter
  11. conversepotter reblogged this from catherine2
  12. littlemisshorror reblogged this from sarufish
  13. bluepinwheel answered: Not really, its just another little nod to Doyle’s other Sherlock cases. There are several of those same instances throughout the show.
  14. fishthumbsandpudding reblogged this from sarufish and added:
    Maybe this is what Moffatt was talking about?
  15. sarufish reblogged this from sherlockbbc
  16. viviano reblogged this from inspectahradio
  17. charcoalkaytlyn answered: It may have just been one of those things they throw in for those who have read the stories. Solitary Cyclist and this have little in common.
  18. loveliuessy reblogged this from forevvy
  19. thatswhatpeopledrink reblogged this from forevvy
  20. hoggleinthetardis reblogged this from forevvy
  21. hilarious-war answered: DEAR LORD
  22. viewfromthetardis answered: Yeah it was actually mentioned by either Gatiss or Moffat in an interview somewhere a bit ago, I can’t remember where exactly.